against:
birth tourism in industrial scale by chinese: 
https://www.theepochtimes.com/china/us-senators-introduce-bill-to-end-birth-tourism-highlighting-large-numbers-from-china-3416271 
https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/ccp-exploiting-birth-tourism-in-america-on-an-industrial-scale-peter-schweizer-5980224

inclusive with surrogacy
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/chinese-billionaire-buys-100-children-through-us-surrogacy-clinics-report/

I agree with nostr:npub1m4ny6hjqzepn4rxknuq94c2gpqzr29ufkkw7ttcxyak7v43n6vvsajc2jl that the constitution defined birthright citizenship.  They certainly did not think on birth tourism back then, but that is the letter of the law, even if it has been abused in industrial scale.  

I do not know the legal details. Could it be interpreted as requiring some intention of really moving to the USA?  Like, if the woman just travels to give birth, keeping her life, job, $$, etc, in the home country, with no arrangements to set up a new life in the USA, could it be interpreted as 'refusing to enter the legal jurisdiction'??