You called me also a Nostr spammer an hour or so ago but that won't offend me as I don't think its true. Other people called me all sorsts of things. Some of them I call them too.
I am also sure you are not a pedo.
I have no bad feelings towards you except when you are not being honest. You can check our communication, I haven't responended to you or asked you questions before although I read all your comments. I started very recently when I felt dishonesty when you took a stance against BIP 110. And again its not the fact on which side but the arguments that you did.
I do respect your work for Bitcoin. I wouldn't be a Bitcoiner if I don't. But we see a prime example with Core that although they have been fine in the past they turned to the dark spam side for the last couple of years.
I don't agree that Bitcoiners who value Bitcoin as Freedom Money and have put their life savings in Bitcoin not only as store of value but to be part of the financial freedom revolution are a mob. We both know what is a memecoin, what is Ethereum shitcoin and so on. And you yourself say that you don't like spam.
I wish you see BIP 110 objectively for what it is.
It limits large arbitrary data, ALL large arbitrary data which happen to be non-monetary spam. That abuses Bitcoin. OP_RETURN up to 83 Bytes is allowed. That is objective truth taken from the BIP 110 itself. Yes someone can put 1000 smaller OP_RETURNs instead of one and that will cost him 1000 times more. BIP 110 fixes insctiptions and fixes important weaknesses and that are words of Bitcoin developers. Also simulations are done that show that BIP 110 allows monetary transactions. Bitcoin continues to be permissionless Monetary network as it should be.
nostr:nevent1qqsysmctvyu6t3wmne7sdx8dca2g3c7r3a08pgdjq4p4wdc58l7qpmgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgcwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxvmm4de6xz6tw9enx6tcjtkuel

About the reorg, this one option out of 4.
https://blockspaceweekly.substack.com/p/bip-110-the-miners-paradox