My 2 cents...

Storybrand has good advice for how to approach this. You act as the guide and first present their problem and then guide them to the solution.

Problem Statement: 
"You spend countless hours creating content, making memories and building a network on your social media accounts. Do you want to set your social media free from its walled garden? Are you scared that your account can be deactivated? Do you censor yourself to avoid being shadow banned?"

Solution Statement: 
"There is a solution that puts you in control and ensure you never lose your content or your followers. Welcome to NOSTR, the social media protocol without the Big Tech gatekeepers.

Avoid bundling choices and triggering fear reaction:
I would change "Join thousands leaving Twitter for a protocol that puts you in control." to not include leaving twitter. It now looks like you also must decide to leave Twitter, which will trigger a fear reaction. Do not say anything about leaving Twitter, Facebook etc. Just focus on NOSTR.

Respect is too vague:
I am not sure 'Social Media That Respects You' captures the essence, because respect is too vague for me. 'Free your social media' could be an alternative. Or maybe 'Take Control of your Social Media'.

Yes=Positive=Nostr / No=Negative=Big Tech:
You have way too many No on the front page. Try and change it to a positive statement. No is negative while Yes is positive. Nostr is positive
and Big Tech is negative. No should only be used for Big Tech and Yes for Nostr