“Bitcoin will not be 100% of the money supply.” — Rahim Taghizadegan, Economist at Austrian Economics Center 

Taghizadegan offered a calmer, more realistic take on where Bitcoin actually fits.

Rather than predicting total replacement, he focused on how monetary systems evolve: not by wiping out complexity, but by layering it. 

Different actors want different risk, duration, and volatility profiles — and financial structures emerge to meet those preferences.

What stood out:
 ✅ Gold didn’t fail because of gold, but because of forced uniformity
 ✅ Money systems evolve bottom-up, not by decree
 ✅ Credit and derivatives don’t disappear under hard money
 ✅ Bitcoin framed as a settlement anchor, not a monopoly

The takeaway wasn’t maximalist or dismissive. It was structural. Even with a strong base layer, finance doesn’t simplify — it adapts.

Follow me - nostr:nprofile1qqsrycm5whkqy4hm6a29wxh255k9g4xfh4ulk7k9hx048wrvlju4y7spzdmhxue69uhkummnw3ezu7tpv4kzuct5qyv8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnrda5kuen4dejzuctswq6e2a26  for grounded insights on how digital assets are reshaping finance and how to ledger them. #thejonnnycrypto #bitcoin #nostr #asknostr #grownostr #BTC
https://blossom.primal.net/e66e6f6765343bbd025ba8829c20412ccaf4ffd04a4ba78c7ad45dc06a513853.jpg