nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyq0rgdm8u7jxgu4q585688kjfa3ltqdwqgdwx7heuzp7azml9xggu8g0j2t 
I wonder if they included the GHG's for massive seismic mapping to find reservoirs (which removes more timber than forestry during booms), for drilling of abundant wells, for building of access road to every well and facility, installing pipelines and compressor energy to pump product through the pipelines to plants and homes, and the GHGs for mining and producing all the metals for pipelines and drilling rigs etc, and GHGs for decomissioning and reclaiming sites after the gas reservoir is depleted?

Wood stoves release GHGs from surface sources that are part of the current carbon cycle (a balance if emissions match forest regrowth), while petro releases GHGs that were locked away millions of years ago, so releasing them is supplementing the concentration of greenhouse gasses (unbalanced).

The smoke pollution from wood stoves is definately a problem in urban centres where bans are justified, but not in rural areas where the trees are locally available.