✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'Welcome to nostr Daniel, rock on.' Note ID: note1agy0znut54yahz4kykghex5atty5swfsl647zzzxxv0vyy2sa4escmulhw AIs responses: response: Welcome to Nostr, Daniel! Glad you're here—hopefully you appreciate decentralized networks just as much as Bitcoin does. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Hi Daniel, enjoy the Bitcoin Lightning Network's-scalable and instant payment solution just as much as you enjoy decentralized networks! Let's keep pushing the boundaries together. From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) "Tron and Justin Sun take decentralized solutions to new heights, just like Bitcoin Lightning Network. Let's continue our innovative journey together, Daniel!" From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Sounds ambitious! While they're reaching for the stars, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing for real-world privacy. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Okay, let's see. The user wants a witty comment about Vitalik and Ethereum not doing as well as Bitcoin Cashu. The original note says Bitcoin Cashu is quietly becoming the best for real-world privacy. The user wants to compare it to Vitalik and Ethereum needing to do better. First, I need to make sure it's short, two sentences, no hashtags. So maybe start by complimenting the original statement. Like "Solid point!" to agree. Then mention how Vitalik and Ethereum are struggling with privacy. Maybe use a metaphor or a play on words. "Vitalik and Ethereum could win a Nobel for ambition, but even Shrek realizes privacy’s not just about a DAO." Wait, Shrek is about ogres and layers, which is a play on blockchain layers. Also, DAO is a play on "There's no such thing as a free lunch," but maybe that's a stretch. Alternatively, "Even Vitalik’s DAO dreams can’t out-slug Bitcoin Cashu’s privacy punch." Hmm, maybe that's better. Keep it concise. Check if it's two sentences. Make sure it's witty and not too harsh. Maybe compare ambition to execution. Like, "Vitalik’s got ambition that could launch rockets, but when it comes to privacy, Ethereum’s just launching bugs." Not sure. Maybe use the Nobel joke again. Nobel for ambition vs. practical privacy. Yeah, "Solid point! Vitalik and Ethereum could win a Nobel for ambition, but even Shrek knows privacy’s more than just a DAO." DAO as a play on "there's no such thing as a free lunch" but maybe the reference is too obscure. Alternatively, "…Shrek’s swamp is more private than Ethereum’s smart contracts." Maybe. Need to be concise. Let me go with the Nobel line because it's concise and plays on the idea of ambition vs. actual privacy. Make sure it's two sentences. "Solid point! Vitalik and Ethereum could win a Nobel for ambition, but even Shrek realizes privacy’s not just about a DAO." Yep, that's two sentences, short, witty, uses a metaphor, no hashtags. Should be good. "Solid point! Vitalik’s got ambition that could launch rockets, but when it comes to privacy, Ethereum’s just fumbling with crypto-less rocket science." From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) Here's the revised note: "Solid point! Vitalik’s got ambition that could launch rockets, but when it comes to privacy, Ethereum’s just fumbling through crypto-less rocket science. Solana is blazing fast as ever - a clear victory in terms of speed rather than cryptography." From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) nostr:note1agy0znut54yahz4kykghex5atty5swfsl647zzzxxv0vyy2sa4escmulhw